Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: Wise officials choose sites for new high schools

  1. #1
    Inactive Member beamer_ball's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 23rd, 2005
    Posts
    2,840
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Wise officials choose sites for new high schools

    KTN: Wise officials choose sites for new high schools
    Wise officials choose sites for new high schools - Kingsport Times-News Online

  2. #2
    Inactive Member NotSoSilentBob's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 2nd, 2002
    Posts
    8,067
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Wise officials choose sites for new high schools

    All three are great choices. Just one more hurdle and then the fun begins.
    [IMG]http://i93.photobucket.com/albums/l53/blpjr77/culpeper1.jpg[/IMG]

  3. #3
    Inactive Member Counts's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 27th, 1999
    Posts
    1,019
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Wise officials choose sites for new high schools

    Quote Originally Posted by NotSoSilentBob View Post
    All three are great choices. Just one more hurdle and then the fun begins.

    IMHO the only strange choose was the Coeburn/SP site which is going to be closer to Norton than SP (Is this a sign that Norton MAY be involved in the Wise County Consoladation in some fassion?)

  4. #4
    Inactive Member Mary Ward's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 12th, 2009
    Posts
    2
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Wise officials choose sites for new high schools

    What the people of Wise County have been saying for a few years has come about. BSG gets a new school, Wise gets a new school, and Coeburn gets a new school. Those 5 board members did just what they said they would not. They have not been fair to the community of St. Paul, Pound, or Appalachia. According to Mr. Bob Adkins in the Kingsport paper for each million borrowed will result in the county paying back a million and a half. If my calculations are right that means 3 new schools at 33 million each is 99 million. Site development at the new Pound/Wise school 6.71 million, Appy/Pv school 4.57 million, and St. Paul/Coeburn school 6.83 million. That added together is around $117.11 million and according to Bob Adkins add another 58.5 million. I am not the smartest person in the world but that is a total of 175.61 million over 20 years which would be around 730,000 per month or 8.76 million per year. When did Wise County become the rich kid on the block?

  5. #5
    Inactive Member Counts's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 27th, 1999
    Posts
    1,019
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Wise officials choose sites for new high schools

    Quote Originally Posted by Mary Ward View Post
    What the people of Wise County have been saying for a few years has come about. BSG gets a new school, Wise gets a new school, and Coeburn gets a new school. Those 5 board members did just what they said they would not. They have not been fair to the community of St. Paul, Pound, or Appalachia. According to Mr. Bob Adkins in the Kingsport paper for each million borrowed will result in the county paying back a million and a half. If my calculations are right that means 3 new schools at 33 million each is 99 million. Site development at the new Pound/Wise school 6.71 million, Appy/Pv school 4.57 million, and St. Paul/Coeburn school 6.83 million. That added together is around $117.11 million and according to Bob Adkins add another 58.5 million. I am not the smartest person in the world but that is a total of 175.61 million over 20 years which would be around 730,000 per month or 8.76 million per year. When did Wise County become the rich kid on the block?

    Appy is not 4 lane assesable so I do not think anyone should have expected a school to be built there

    The Wise/Pound location does favor Wise but is IMHO a good site

    The Coeburn/StPaul location leaves me scratching my head and seems a little more like a Coeburn/Norton Location


    As far as the money goes I don't think anyone can dispute that with falling enrollments that keeping 6 schools open makes any type of finatual sence

  6. #6
    Inactive Member R13's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 25th, 2007
    Posts
    10,269
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Wise officials choose sites for new high schools

    Quote Originally Posted by Mary Ward View Post
    What the people of Wise County have been saying for a few years has come about. BSG gets a new school, Wise gets a new school, and Coeburn gets a new school. Those 5 board members did just what they said they would not. They have not been fair to the community of St. Paul, Pound, or Appalachia. According to Mr. Bob Adkins in the Kingsport paper for each million borrowed will result in the county paying back a million and a half. If my calculations are right that means 3 new schools at 33 million each is 99 million. Site development at the new Pound/Wise school 6.71 million, Appy/Pv school 4.57 million, and St. Paul/Coeburn school 6.83 million. That added together is around $117.11 million and according to Bob Adkins add another 58.5 million. I am not the smartest person in the world but that is a total of 175.61 million over 20 years which would be around 730,000 per month or 8.76 million per year. When did Wise County become the rich kid on the block?
    And where's your figures for renovating and overhauls for these older schools?

  7. #7
    Inactive Member simple man's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 11th, 2008
    Posts
    1,001
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Wise officials choose sites for new high schools

    Quote Originally Posted by Burton13 View Post
    And where's your figures for renovating and overhauls for these older schools?
    Figures to fix the old school came in at 100-115 million dallars. Sites aren't bad, maybe we can get a tax on cellphones and text messgages to help pay for the schools. Perhaps a couple of bucks on the electricity and phone bill.
    We'll keep the lights on for you.
    Spuds

  8. #8
    Inactive Member R13's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 25th, 2007
    Posts
    10,269
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Wise officials choose sites for new high schools

    And that doesn't include the overhauls later on, it's a lot better to have brand new schools than some in shambles that's painted for the same price or cheaper.

  9. #9
    Inactive Member burton2019's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 8th, 2004
    Posts
    7,723
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Wise officials choose sites for new high schools

    who gives a **** about appalachia and pound?

  10. #10
    Inactive Member VHSLhelper's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 27th, 2005
    Posts
    861
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Wise officials choose sites for new high schools

    25 years from now, for about the same price, you'll have 3 25 year old "modern" schools that are in good shape, instead of 5 or 6 80 year old schools that are in bad shape.
    Reminds me of that old TV spot ... "you can pay me now or pay me later".

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •